For Your Tech Gurus

Built to be
audited.

Every vendor tells you they’re secure; you’re the one holding the bag when they aren’t. So we’ll skip the adjectives and describe the architecture — and we’d rather you ask the hard questions now than after procurement.

Every reason to hesitate.
Every one answered.

Agents that act inside a business deserve scrutiny — the incident reports are real, and skepticism is the correct starting position. These are the concerns we hear from IT teams, and how the architecture answers each one.

“What can an agent actually do?”

An agent can never exceed the permissions of the person it works for. Autonomy is earned through a trust battery — supervised first, more rope only as it proves reliable — and sensitive domains such as financials and payroll carry a hard floor no agent crosses, at any trust level.

“Who did that — the agent, or the user?”

Every Kauli agent is its own principal, not a script running on someone’s credentials. Every action is attributed to the agent and the person it acted for, in an audit trail that records what it read, what it did, and who approved.

“What happens when it reads something malicious?”

Instructions found in documents, emails, and web pages are treated as data, not commands — and agents do their work inside contained environments with bounded tools, not loose on your systems. Ambiguity stops the action rather than guessing, and security agents — the Centurions — watch agent behaviour around the clock. We treat AI security as its own discipline and adversarially review our own releases.

“Where does our data end up?”

In your tenant’s own database, and nowhere else. The platform’s AI is managed and governed by Kauli — Kauli never trains anything on your data — and enterprise deployments can add data residency or fully self-hosted models that never leave your network. Your data and knowledge base are exportable, unconditionally.

“What’s the blast radius when something goes wrong?”

Small, by design. Outward-facing and irreversible actions sit behind human-in-the-loop approval gates, tiered by risk — routine work flows, consequential work waits for a person. Nothing an agent does is silent, and your administrators can cut any agent’s access instantly.

“Who’s in control day to day?”

Your administrators. One console governs who sees what, which agents may act where, and how much autonomy each has earned — and one governed platform beats a sprawl of ungoverned AI tools nobody’s watching.

Built to a standard.
Honest about the badges.

We’d rather show you the architecture than wave a logo — and we won’t call ourselves “certified” or “compliant” for anything we’ve only self-assessed, because you shouldn’t trust a vendor that does. Here’s exactly where we stand.

Now — Designed Against
NIST CSF 2.0  ·  CIS Controls v8  ·  OWASP ASVS Level 2
Working Toward
A CSA STAR Level 1 registry listing  ·  SOC 2 Type I  ·  a public trust page (subprocessors, data handling, controls)
On the Roadmap — as Contracts Require
SOC 2 Type II  ·  ISO 27001  ·  HIPAA  ·  PIPEDA / Quebec Law 25  ·  GDPR

Full detail on the architecture behind these commitments lives in our security overview.

Ask us the
hard questions.

Our security overview is published, and the person answering your questions is the person who built the system. Bring your checklist — SOC 2 posture, data flows, agent containment, model providers — and we’ll go as deep as you like.